Assumptions, Key Inputs & Advantages and Disadvantages of the Constant Growth Model
Gordon Growth Model Formula Assumptions
Below are some of those assumptions:
- It is assumed that the company’s life is indefinite.
- We also have to assume that the growth of the firm is at a constant rate.
- The firm’s financial leverage is stable, or it doesn’t have any financial leverage attached to it.
- The required rate of return is higher and better than the growth rate.
- The required rate of return of the firm remains constant.
- The company’s free cash flow is paid out as dividends at consistent growth rates.
This growth takes into account three critical inputs, which are growth rate in dividends per share, dividends per share, and the required rate of return. They are the three components that make up the GGM formula mentioned above.
Let’s look at each of the three key inputs in details:
Dividends per share (D) – This input talks about the yearly payments, which a firm offers to its common equity shareholders. It is represented with the letter “D,” as seen in the formula above.
The growth rate in dividends per share (g) – Here is another parameter you will find on the formula given above. It is called the growth rate and looks at the level at which the rate of dividends per share rises, year to year. It is represented with the letter “g” in the Gordon Growth Model formula.
The required rate of return (r) – This input concerns the minimum rate of return, which investors are ready to accept when purchasing the stock of the company. Furthermore, there are diverse models an investor can use to estimate it.
What the Gordon Growth Model assumes is this. Remember that we said that the model only works for firms whose dividends grow at a constant rate. So the model assumes that a firm exists indefinitely and pays dividends for each share, which rises at a steady rate.
Despite the condition of the market, this model still calculates a stock’s fair value and takes into account different factors. These include the market expected returns and dividend payout factors.
Despite the condition of the market, this model still calculates a stock’s fair value and takes into account different factors. These include the market expected returns and dividend payout factors.
Advantages of the Gordon Growth Model:
- Simplicity:
This valuation model is super easy to understand and apply. The reason for this is that its inputs are available, and you can even assume them by accessing the firm’s financial statements or annual report.
- Efficient
You will find the model more efficient for more stable firms, particularly those that have limited business expenses and good cash flow.
- Scope
The model has widespread application in the real estate sector, and its proving to be a handy tool for investors and agents alike.
Disadvantages of the Gordon Growth Model- Precision Required
One of the drawbacks or limitations the model has is the assumption of steady growth in the dividend. Even the best companies in the world might have challenges to maintain a constant growth rate due to factors like changes in the market, financial difficulties, among others.
- Not Useful for all Companies
The model is not useful for companies with financial leverage or those with unstable cash flows.
- Negative Value Result
The model can result in a negative value if the required rate of return is very less than the growth rate.
Great
ReplyDeleteGreat job
ReplyDeleteGood work
ReplyDeleteKeep it up
ReplyDeleteHelpful article
ReplyDeleteGood
ReplyDelete